accidents at work claims management in Liverpool

Double Prosecution

After a worker suffered life changing injuries, two companies were sentenced for breaching safety regulations. The two companies were; Principal contractor Weiser Construction Ltd and Complete Cladding Systems Ltd.

Brian Robinson was working as a sheeter cladder on the 4th January 2016, at the weiser construction site at the John Cotton factory in Mirfield, West Yorkshire. Leeds Magistrate’s Court heard how he was on a factory roof affixing sheet metal cladding and capping to the gable end of an adjoining build, when he fell through the roof as he was tying the cappings to it. Mr Robinson fell 9.7m into the factory area below through a roof light. Mr Robinson had operations, which would insert six pins into his pelvis, two pins to the top and to pins to the bottom of his femur, after suffering an open fracture to his femur and many fractures to his pelvis.

A further investigation found that the original scaffold that had been built upon the roof, had been removed previous to the cladding work being completed. The preferred control measure was to use spandeck boards with guardrails, however the use of those boards would have meant that the workers were unable to affic the handrails in situ.

There had not been any nets scheduled to be used the factory area. The top half of Mr Robinson’s leg had been struck by the top of a storage cage as he fell from the roof approximately 2.4m high, prior to falling further to the floor behind the storage cage.

The company which is now in liquidation, has been fined £145,000 with £5,046.30 costs. As the Weiser Ltd construction of Clark Business Recovery Ltd, York Place, Leeds pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

After pleading guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the Complete Cladding Systems Ltd of Newton Cap House, Toronto, Bishop Auckland has been fined  £165,000 with £5,114.49 costs.

Inspector Paul Thompson commented after the hearing saying, ”Work at height, such as roof work, is a high-risk activity that accounts for a high proportion of workplace serious injuries and fatalities each year. This was a wholly avoidable incident, caused by the failure of the principal contractor to manage and monitor the works to ensure the correct work equipment was being used. This risk was further amplified by the cladding company’s failure to ensure suitable measures were in place to prevent persons falling a distance liable to cause personal injury.”

author avatar
Lyndsy Sword
Co-founder & Director at Wolf Law | SRA-approved Solicitor

How much compensation could you be owed?

If you’ve been involved in an accident, you could be owed compensation. Contact us today to determine the validity of your claim and find out how much you could be owed.

How much compensation could you be owed?

If you’ve been involved in an accident, you could be owed compensation. Contact us today to determine the validity of your claim and find out how much you could be owed.
Surgeon in a sterile gown, mask and cap, handing instruments over an operating table in a dimly lit OR.

Unnecessary surgery claims: what patients need to know

A recent NHS trust claim highlights the questions patients may face after an operation that may not have been needed. This guide explains how medical negligence claims work, what evidence can help, and why early legal advice matters. It covers consent, clinical records, limitation periods, rehabilitation and the practical steps a patient can take after unexpected treatment. Wolf Law helps people understand their options through a free initial consultation, while each claim depends on its own medical evidence and legal facts.

Read More »
Overwhelmed man in a blue shirt sits at a desk with a cardboard box of items, hand on his forehead in a bright office.

Removal of the unfair dismissal cap: what employers and workers need to know

The proposed removal of the statutory cap on unfair dismissal compensation could change how workplace disputes are assessed in England and Wales. Employers may need stronger procedures, while workers could have greater protection where a dismissal causes serious financial loss. This guide explains the legal background, what the change may mean, and the practical steps employees and businesses should take. It also covers time limits, evidence, internal appeals and the value of early legal advice before an employment tribunal claim is started.

Read More »